Disclosures

Nobody pays for this site and nobody is paid for it.

That beats a paragraph of assurance, because you can check it. The site is a few hundred kilobytes of static HTML in a public repository, and an affiliate link is a thing you can search for.

What is absent

The negatives, in full

None of the following exists anywhere on this site or behind it.

Advertising, of any kind, in any position.
Affiliate links, referral links, broker sign-up bonuses, and tracking codes on an outbound link. A link out of here carries nothing that says where you came from.
Sponsors, underwriters, grants, and anyone with a right to see a page before it is published.
Compensation, in cash or in kind, from any fund company, index provider, broker, custodian, adviser or data vendor. Nothing was placed here for money and nothing as a favour.
Anything for sale. No subscription, no newsletter, no course, no book, no consulting, no software, and no waiting list.
Analytics. No measurement JavaScript, no cookie, no fingerprinting. What traffic data exists is public and aggregate, and never touches the page.

The site names 66 funds by ticker, which is worth something to the companies that run them. They are named because somebody read their filings, several are named unkindly, and none of those companies knows this site exists.

What is present

The interests that do exist

Having no revenue removes one way of being wrong and leaves every other way alone. These are the ones that apply here.

What the author owns

Not stated yet. The author has not published whether he holds any of the funds named on this site, and nothing here should be read as saying that he does or that he does not.

Whatever the answer turns out to be, it belongs here, because a person who owns what he argues for has money riding on the argument being right. Amounts and balances stay private.

The author would like the work to be right

Months went into this, and nobody who spends months on an argument is neutral about it afterwards. No disclosure fixes that. What the project does instead is make disagreement cheap: the corrections log records it working, and an issue is how you add to it.

Tools and data

The AI tools used to build this were bought at retail. No vendor was consulted, none has seen a page before publication, and none has any say in what the pages claim.

Every data source here is free and public, and each download is recorded with a hash of the exact bytes used, so a provider quietly restating its own history shows up as a mismatch. There is no paid feed and no commercial arrangement with any provider, which is a limitation as much as a virtue. The method page says what that leaves unanswerable.